Unlocking Institutional Finance on Liquid Network

April 23, 2025

The financial sector’s adoption of blockchain technology has reached a significant inflection point. While Bitcoin established the foundation for decentralized finance, its base layer lacks the scalability, transaction efficiency, and regulatory adaptability required by institutional investors. The Liquid Network has emerged as a Layer 2 Bitcoin solution, designed to enhance privacy, accelerate settlements, and support compliance-driven financial operations.

With $3.4 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL), Liquid has transitioned from a conceptual framework to a functional platform facilitating institutional-grade financial services. Its expanding ecosystem includes a range of tokenized assets, such as:

A notable $1.8 billion in Mifiel Promissory Notes
$645 million in Blockstream Mining Notes (BMN2)
$36 million in Tether (USDT)
$30 million in US T-bills (USTBL)
$10 million in Mikro Kapital Bonds
$8.58 million in Aquarius Fund
$6.1 million in Mexas
$5 million in Basic

These figures underscore Liquid’s increasing relevance within blockchain-based finance. Its secure, efficient, and compliance-aligned infrastructure is gaining traction among institutional participants seeking structured solutions for digital asset issuance and settlement.

What makes Liquid Network particularly attractive to financial institutions?
The Liquid Network is an open-source Bitcoin sidechain purpose-built for financial applications that require fast settlement, confidentiality, and regulatory oversight. Below are key aspects that make Liquid particularly attractive to institutional participants:

1. Confidential Transactions with Regulatory Considerations
Liquid integrates confidential transactions at the protocol level, using cryptographic blinding to obscure transaction amounts and asset types by default. Unlike other solutions that rely on additional layers for privacy, Liquid incorporates this feature natively, reducing operational complexity. This allows institutions to maintain transactional confidentiality while still meeting regulatory reporting requirements.

2. Faster Settlement and Operational Efficiency
Traditional financial systems and even Bitcoin’s base layer often experience settlement delays ranging from hours to days. Liquid enhances transaction efficiency with one-minute block times and two-block finality, significantly reducing settlement risk to about two minutes. For institutions moving large capital flows, this speed ensures better liquidity management, reduced counterparty risk, and operational predictability.

3. Peg-In/Peg-Out Mechanism for Bitcoin Interoperability
Liquid allows BTC to be transferred into its ecosystem as LBTC, ensuring seamless interoperability with Bitcoin’s main chain. This feature enables institutions to leverage Bitcoin’s liquidity while benefiting from Liquid’s faster transaction speeds and enhanced privacy.

4. Federated Governance: A Balanced Approach
While full decentralization is a key feature in crypto-native ecosystems, financial institutions require structured governance frameworks to manage risk and compliance. Unlike Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus, Liquid operates on a Federated Byzantine Agreement model, where a designated set of functionaries validate transactions. This governance structure provides institutions with a more predictable operational framework while maintaining key elements of decentralization.

5. Purpose-Built for Tokenized Financial Assets
Liquid’s architecture supports tokenized securities, bond issuances, and financial derivatives, addressing institutional needs for privacy, security, and compliance. Its covenant-based framework allows for programmable restrictions on asset transfers, ensuring that transactions adhere to predefined regulatory and operational standards. Unlike open-ended scripting environments, this structured approach prioritizes security and compliance, reducing exposure to smart contract vulnerabilities and ensuring controlled asset movements.

Liquid Network Vs. Ethereum
Building on Liquid’s structured approach to institutional finance, it is essential to compare different networks based on their core features, security mechanisms, and regulatory readiness. Liquid and Ethereum each serve distinct purposes, catering to different segments of the financial ecosystem.

Ethereum offers broader flexibility through smart contracts and decentralized applications, making it the preferred choice for permissionless innovation. In contrast, Liquid prioritizes predictability, compliance, and operational security, making it a more attractive platform for structured financial products that require regulatory adherence and restricted access.

While Ethereum’s open and composable nature fosters a high degree of interoperability, it also introduces complexity in regulatory compliance, security risks, and transaction cost volatility. Liquid’s controlled and deterministic environment helps address these concerns by limiting exposure to unauthorized participants and enhancing transaction privacy.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite its advantages, Liquid Network faces several operational and adoption-related challenges:

Governance Centralization: The reliance on a predefined set of functionaries raises concerns about collusion risks and regulatory pressures. For example, if a group of functionaries were to collude, they could potentially censor transactions or exert control over network governance, undermining the principles of decentralization that many blockchain networks prioritize. Similarly, regulatory authorities could impose restrictions on functionaries, impacting network neutrality.
Limited Developer Ecosystem: Compared to Ethereum and Solana, Liquid has fewer active developers, which may slow innovation and ecosystem growth. A smaller developer base means fewer third-party applications and integrations. For instance, while Ethereum has thousands of DeFi applications, Liquid’s ecosystem is limited, making it harder for new projects to find developer support and build upon existing infrastructure.
Liquidity Constraints: The network’s institutional focus results in lower on-chain liquidity and reduced integration with broader DeFi infrastructure. For example, while Bitcoin and Ethereum have highly liquid decentralized exchanges, Liquid-based assets often rely on OTC deals or niche trading platforms, making it harder to achieve price discovery and efficient market participation.
Interoperability Barriers: The Peg-In/Peg-Out mechanism can create friction for non-institutional users seeking broader adoption. For example, a retail investor looking to move BTC into the Liquid Network must navigate a multi-step process, which could discourage adoption.

The long-term success of Liquid depends on addressing these challenges through enhanced infrastructure, broader developer engagement, and ecosystem expansion. If these obstacles are effectively mitigated, Liquid could position itself as a dominant player in the regulated blockchain finance sector.

Strategic Outlook and Market Expansion

To strengthen its competitive position, Liquid should:

Enhance interoperability by developing bridges to connect with major blockchain ecosystems and financial networks, allowing Liquid-based assets to seamlessly interact with Ethereum and other leading networks.
Increase network liquidity by fostering institutional partnerships and encouraging broader participation in Liquid-based assets. Collaboration with custodians, asset managers, and regulated exchanges can help drive adoption.
Improve developer accessibility by expanding tooling and infrastructure for financial applications.
Expand financial product offerings to include corporate bonds, real-world assets, and structured products, strengthening Liquid’s position as a preferred platform for institutional finance.

As financial institutions increasingly explore blockchain-based asset tokenization, Liquid’s privacy-preserving and compliance-driven framework positions it as a viable alternative in regulated digital finance. However, staying competitive requires continuous innovation, ecosystem development, and regulatory alignment. If Liquid can address its current limitations while maintaining its advantages, it has the potential to become a leading infrastructure for institutional digital asset issuance and trading.

Learn More About Particula

At Particula, we have developed the first rating and analytics platform for tokenized assets. Our goal is to provide the next generation of ratings for the next generation of assets in order to give investors instant security, clarity and better market access.

To learn more or gain access to our platform, please contact us at info@particula.io